Religion and atheism suspicions and reaction.

Abstract

This research is about his life in his life. The Status of the Import of the Arts of Information. And the danger lies in the effects that translate in the lives of people from the occurrence of the second life or not to occur, the experimentalists claim in this matter is not tangible and not tried in a sense not proven by science through experience and analysis All that is proven by science from this road is committed to it, and unless proven from this path no one has the right to speak it, and in their view, this is not the way to prove knowledge and facts. The search is based on the consideration of the origin of knowledge. Is it possible to prove without experience something or not? The question is whether religion has a basis or not? Is it important to know this or not?

The research concludes with the liberation of the issue and the concept of the comprehensive science of perception and theoretical and empirical validation, and clarifying the fundamental differences between each. It shows the differentiation of science and the limits of each science. The science is not confined to what is proven by experimentation and sense alone. It also shows the meaning of sense and perception, The theory of the mind, and that it is categorical knowledge and that the experimentalists are opposed to it, it proves that religion is not a lack of mental evidence, and therefore see the divine scholars of Muslims and others based on the issue of proof of duty on the mental evidence, and opponents of what they learned that overlooked the mind and clung to the ears of For modern science based on sensory experience